Microsoft president Brad Smith calls for global AI safety rules and says the UK is best placed to lead
In a BBC interview, Smith proposed incident reporting, independent evaluations before release and an emergency brake for AI systems, and pointed to the UK’s AI Security Institute as a possible model.
How this story was checked
- ResearchedWith AI assistance · 2 sources
- AI source checkEach sentence matched to its source
- Editor approvalMayank Sahu · 13 Oct, 11:30
- Published13 Oct, 11:30
In short
Microsoft president Brad Smith said in a BBC interview published on 12 October 2026 that the moment has arrived for global AI safety rules and that the UK is best placed to lead them. He proposed mandatory incident reporting, independent evaluations and an emergency brake for rogue AI agents.
What Smith said
Microsoft vice chair and president Brad Smith said in a BBC interview that the “moment has arrived” for global AI safety rules, TechCrunch reported on 12 October 2026.1 Fox News, with Reuters contributing, reported the same interview.2
“Right now, your washing machine is subject to more safety rules than AI,” Smith said, according to Fox News.2 He described AI as both a “weapon and a tool” that puts cybersecurity at risk.1
Why the UK
Smith argued that the UK, rather than the US or the EU, is best placed to lead on global safety rules.1 “In Washington, D.C., people don’t look at the U.K. and they don’t look at London the way they look at Brussels,” he said, calling this “a strength”.1 He pointed to Britain’s AI Security Institute as a possible model for global oversight.2
What he proposed
Both reports say Smith supports independent evaluations of AI systems, a legal duty to tell organisations when rogue AI agents breach their systems, and an emergency brake or kill-switch to stop AI if humans lose control.12 He also called for companies to document safety incidents.2
On voluntary commitments, he said the “good companies” will comply, adding: “It’s the companies that are not as responsible that you need to worry about.”1
Context
TechCrunch reports that Smith called a recent White House safety document signed by tech leaders a “good step” that stops short of needed regulation.1 TechCrunch also reports that the UK AI Security Institute confirmed on 12 October that it can access and test the latest models, citing Reuters.1
What is not known
Smith’s comments are proposals. No government has said it will adopt them, and the reports do not say whether Microsoft will submit them formally.12
Fact ledger
How labels workQuestions readers ask
What did Brad Smith propose?
Independent evaluations of AI systems, mandatory reporting of AI incidents, notifying organisations breached by rogue AI agents, and an emergency brake to stop AI.
Why does he think the UK should lead?
He said the UK is not viewed in Washington the way Brussels is, and pointed to its AI Security Institute as a possible model.
Is this a new law?
No. These are proposals made in an interview.